Fall Issues Conference 2019 – Agenda

Agenda

8:30 – 9:45 Cong. Liaisons Breakfast     Breakfast and conversation with Board members

9:30 – 10:00   Registration

10:00 – 10:10   Welcome & Worship     Rev. Andrée Mol, Central Unitarian Church

10:10 – 10:15   Remembering Luis Merlo     CUC members

10:15 – 10:30   Welcome & Update     Tim Catts, Board President & Rev. Rob Gregson, Exec. Director

10:30 – 10:35   Another Way to Serve     Carolyn Baldacchini, Chair, Nominating Committee

10:35 – 10:45   Helping Justice Thrive     Marty Rothfelder, Chair, and Rev. Jennifer Kelleher, Eco Gala 2020 Committee

10:45 – 12:15   Keynote Panel w/Q & A.    Prof. Sara Wakefield, Tia Ryans, Andrea McChristian

12:15 – 1:30   Lunch   Lunch with A Leader” in the Sanctuary

1:30 – 1:40   Task Force Introductions    Tom Moran, Chair, Task Force Committee

1:40 – 3:15   Task Force Break-out Groups & Voting on Issues

Gun Violence Prevention –  Kathy Allen

Criminal Justice Reform –  Susan MacDonnell and Anne Houle

Environmental Justice –  Nancy Griffeth and Ray Nichols

Immigration Justice  – Clara Haignere and Peggy Hayden

Reproductive Justice  – Carol Loscalzo

3:15 Break

3:30 Closing

Legislative Priorities 2019/2020

page1image4903184

Legislative Priorities 2019/2020

CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

  1. Restore right-to-vote to those on parole, probation, and those still incarcerated
  2. Dignity for Primary Caretakers Act, for incarcerated women
  3. Reform parole system to include ways for certain offenders to earn their way to earlier parole

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

  1. Mandatory emissions reductions in EJ communities, including transition to electric buses and alternate fuel trucks
  2. Reduce single use plastic bags
  3. Maintain adequate water infrastructure – no lead in NJ water

GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION

  1. Continue to support Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO)
  2. Work with NJ legislators to strengthen proposed Safe Storage of Guns bill

IMMIGRATION JUSTICE

  1. Drivers licenses for undocumented. We expect this to be considered and presumably enacted in the 2019 lame-duck legislative session.
  2. Increased funding for legal defense for detainees in NJ facilities. This is connected with the budget process. As part of the NJ Universal Representation Coalition for the past two years, we will continue to advocate for the amount required to ensure all detainees without means have access to legal rep.

REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE

  1. Access to reproductive healthcare, including abortion care, by working with coalitions who are introducing legislation in NJ
  2. Strengthen maternal health and reduce maternal mortality including supporting the Maternal Mortality Review Committee
  3. Dignity for incarcerated Primary Caregivers Act, a bundle of bills that incorporates allowances for incarcerated parents to spend time with their children, bans the use of shackles for pregnant women and provide appropriate mental health and substance abuse care
  4. Work alongside a newly formed coalition working to pass/bundle bills related to preventing & supporting sexual assault survivors including reporting and investigating sexual assault inside NJ prisons

Annual Fall Issues Conference held on October 19, 2019

The UU FaithAction NJ annual Fall Issues Conference was held on Saturday, October 19 at Central Unitarian Church in Paramus.  This well-attended event featured a panel of criminal justice experts.  If you were unable to attend, you can still read the reports by clicking on the link below.

Get Conference Packet Information Here: https://www.uufaithaction.org/?page_id=8284&preview=true

Trump-Pence’s Title X Gag Rule Will Harm New Jersey Women

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF NEW JERSEY

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

February 22, 2019

Contact: Casey Olesko 973-775-2781 / Casey.Olesko@ppgnnj.org

Trump-Pence’s Title X Gag Rule Will Harm New Jersey Women

70 percent of Title X patients in NJ go to Planned Parenthood for care

TRENTON, NJ — Today, the Trump-Pence administration released a gag rule that undermines Title X, the nation’s program for affordable birth control and reproductive health care, and makes it illegal for health care providers in the program to refer patients for an abortion.

“The administration has put health care providers like Planned Parenthood in an impossible position: withhold information from our patients, or get pushed out of a program designed to ensure that people struggling to make ends meet can still access essential reproductive health care,” said Triste Brooks, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Northern, Central, and Southern New Jersey. “We won’t withhold critical information from our patients.”

“Health care is a human right and we will not let this stand,” said Roslyn Y. Rogers Collins, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan New Jersey. “The Trump-Pence administration may not think you deserve care, but we do.”

Title X is the nation’s only program for affordable birth control and preventive reproductive health care. Title X ensures that every person — regardless of who they are, where they live, how much money they make, or whether they’re insured — has access to basic reproductive health services, such as birth control, cancer screenings, and STD testing and treatment.

In New Jersey, more than 70 percent of the patients served by Title X received care at a Planned Parenthood health center. Planned Parenthood was the sole Title X provider in 13 New Jersey counties in 2018. Without Planned Parenthood, all other Title X-funded sites in New Jersey would have to increase their contraceptive client caseloads by 254 percent to serve the women who currently obtain birth control from Planned Parenthood health centers.

The Murphy administration has already publicly denounced the gag rule, and members of New Jersey’s Congressional delegation have also spoken out against the harmful change.

“The ‘gag rule’ targets women who live in underserved communities, already facing obstacles to accessing health care,” said Brooks. “We won’t be deterred; Planned Parenthood is committed to providing the care patients need — no matter what.”

A fact sheet on Title X’s impact in New Jersey is available here.

Reproductive Justice Annual Report 2018

 

UUFANJ REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE TASK FORCE (RJTF)

ANNUAL REPORT – APRIL 21, 2018

The Reproductive Justice Task Force had a busy and productive year.  The task force has followed closely the progress of our Signature Legislation at the same time that we have followed new initiatives. Special concern is the reproductive justice issues that are intersectional and impact especially on the lives of women of color.  

Legal Advocacy Signature Legislation

The Legal Advocacy Signature Legislation, the first initiated by UUFANJ, is the Address Confidentiality Program for Reproductive Health Service Employees and Clients.  It will “initiate legislation to add abortion providers and their support staff to those eligible for protection under New Jersey’s Address Confidentiality Program (ACP)”.    Sen. Loretta Weinberg is Senate sponsor (S1761). The bill was referred to Senate Health, Human Services and Senior Citizens Committee and was heard on March 5.  Lessie Culmer-Nier and Tom Moran were at the hearing representing UUFANJ.  Tom testified by reading one of the pieces of written testimony from a clinic worker.   Carol Loscalzo had submitted written testimony to the Senate staff from 4 people, 3 working in clinics and one, David S. Cohen, Esq. ,  the author who wrote “Living in the Crosshairs:  the Untold Story of Anti-Abortion Terrorism.  ” The bill was voted out of committee and referred to Budget and Appropriations Committee.  

A1861- Asw. Pam Lampitt is the Assembly sponsor with Asm.  John McKeon and Asw. Nancy Pinkin co sponsoring.  It has been referred to Assembly Health and Senior Services Committee.  

Initiatives and Issues

The task force joined with the Criminal Justice Task Force to sponsor an event at the Monmouth congregation on 2/ 18/18, “Know Her Truths: Life behind Bars for Women in NJ”.   It explored the gendered challenges women face in NJ prisons, including sexual violence, reproductive assaults, and mothering from the inside.  The panel featured our own Johanna Foster, PhD, Johanna Christian, PhD and two returning citizens.   Approximately 100 participants attended this early afternoon event.   The event involved the cooperation of two task forces and highlighted the intersectionality of the work.  We were very grateful for the hospitality of the Monmouth congregation, especially the Racial Justice Committee.   The legislative interests the task force is tacking reflect some of the outcomes of the day.   

An immediate outcome of the event presented itself when on 2/22 the Senate Law and Public Service Committee held a hearing about sexual assault allegations at Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women.  The task force was represented at the hearing by two members and Rev. Rob Gregson.   So far, there have not been any initiatives as an outcome.  

Other Legislation that is Being Tracked by the RJ Task Force

ASSEMBLY BILL 2186 – TO PROHIBIT RESTRAINT OF FEMALE INMATES DURING LABOR AND CHILDBIRTH (Huttle et al.  )   Under the bill, correctional facility staff or medical providers would not be permitted to apply restraints to a prisoner known to be pregnant during any stage of labor, any pregnancy related medical distress, transport to a medical facility, delivery, or postpartum.  Restraints would be allowed if determination is made that the prisoner presents a substantial flight risk; or some other extraordinary medical or security circumstance exists. In cases when restraints are permitted, the bill would require that the least restrictive type and application of restraint necessary would be used.

 SENATE BILL 495 ESTABLISHES MATERNAL MORTALITY REVIEW COMMISSION (Vitale, Ruiz) AND ASSEMBLY BILL 1862 (Lampitt, Mukherji, Huttle and Pinkin)  This bill would annually review and report on rates and causes of maternal death in New Jersey and recommend improvement to maternal care. This legislation is critical to help determine the causes of rising maternal deaths in NJ and ensure that health care providers are able to identify the most effective strategies for improving maternal care. Referred to Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee. The Assembly bill has been referred to the Assembly Women and Children Committee and was reported out of committee on March 12, 2018.  

 ASSEMBLY BILL 314 – RESTRICTS USE OF SOLITARY CONFINEMENT IN STATE PRISONS, JAILS, DETENTION FACILITIES  (Pinkin et al)  The bill prohibits inmates from being placed in isolated confinement unless there is reasonable cause to believe that the inmate or others would be at substantial risk of immediate, serious harm as evidenced by recent threats or conduct, and any less restrictive intervention would be insufficient to reduce that risk.  Defines isolated confinement as “confinement of an inmate in a correctional facility in a cell or similarly confined holding or living space, alone or with other inmates, for approximately 20 hours or more per day with severely restricted activity, movement, and social interaction.” Inmates determined to be “vulnerable” cannot be placed in solitary confinement:  21 years of age or younger; is 65 years of age or older; has a disability based on a mental illness, a history of psychiatric hospitalization, and other identifiers.

SENATE BILL 108 – ESTABLISHES A PROGRAM IN TO FACILITATE THE COMMUNITY REINTEGRATION OF CERTAIN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIMS FOLLOWING THEIR INCARCERATION FOR CRIMES AGAINST THEIR ABUSERS (Weinberg) AND ASSEMBLY BILL 1022 (Johnson and Mosquera)  The program is referred to as supervised community reintegration. Those selected undergo reentry training, and agree to a reintegration plan outlining their responsibilities under the program, which may include a secure residential community placement and participation in a work release program.  Participants who fail to fulfill their responsibilities under their reintegration plan or who violate the provisions of the program would be removed from the program. The State Parole Board may release an inmate from incarceration into the community reintegration program pursuant to criteria established in the bill.  Senate bill referred to the Senate Law and Public Safety Committee and Assembly bill referred to Assembly Women to and Children Committee.

Coalition /Advocacy Work

  • Co-sponsored the January 20 Women’s March on NJ in Morristown.  
  • My Health My Life Coalition – The task force chair continued as an active member of the coalition.  It advocated strongly for the restoration of family planning funding which was signed by the Governor on February 21.  
  • Sponsored National Council of Jewish Women, Essex County Unit‘s Roe event,   Danger Pregnancy Ahead:  Examining the growing number of infringements on women’s access to health care and how the women’s overall health is being alarmingly jeopardized”.  
  • The task force chair was invited to join the Crisis Pregnancy Centers (Fake Clinics) task force representing UUFANJ.  A Round Table to determine next steps is planned for the fall.  

Carol A. Loscalzo, Reproductive Justice Task Force chair

Talking Points on the Reproductive Health Act

page1image49922256

TALKING POINTS ON THE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACT

January 30, 2019

The following talking points were developed in order to answer questions about New York’s Reproductive Health Act (RHA) or any related proactive abortion legislation, and particularly to respond to tough questions about these bills’ implications for later abortion care.

What the Reproductive Health Act does:

  • On January 22, 2019, New York passed the Reproductive Health Act (RHA).
  • With the RHA in place, medical providers are able to meet the needs of their patients without political interference. It accomplished three main things:
  • New York State now treats abortion as health care, not a criminal act. No other medical procedure is regulated as a crime, and abortion should be no different.
  • The RHA ensures that qualified health care providers can provide safe abortion care without fear of punishment.
  • Providers can now provide abortion after the 24th week of pregnancy if a woman’s health or life is in danger, or if a fetus is not viable.
  • Erika Christensen’s story is an example of the harsh reality women faced before the RHA if they had health complications or unviable pregnancies. They were often forced to risk their health and wellbeing by traveling out of state to receive critical abortion care.
  • Every pregnancy is different, and legislators should never tie the hands of medical professionals who should be free to provide the best care for their patients.

Tough Question: Does the RHA (or laws like it) allow abortion up to the point of birth?

  • This is an inflammatory misrepresentation of this bill/act. Anti-abortion politicians for too long have tried to micromanage this medical procedure to score political points. We need to leave medicine to the medical professionals.
  • Let me tell you what this bill/act actually does. It ensures that when serious medical complications arise later in pregnancy, doctors have access to the full range of medical treatment options, including c-section, induction, or abortion if that is the safest course– all based on what’s best for a woman’s specific medical circumstance, and without medically unnecessary requirements or political interference.
  • This bill/act is about making sure that at every point in pregnancy, a woman’s health drives important medical decisions. Politicians are not medical experts and this is not an area where they should be interfering.

    If you have further questions about the Reproductive Health Act, please contact Tara Sweeney, tsweeney@nirhealth.org